pysec-2024-256
Vulnerability from pysec
Published
2024-12-03 16:15
Modified
2025-06-27 17:22
Details
Mobile Security Framework (MobSF) is a pen-testing, malware analysis and security assessment framework capable of performing static and dynamic analysis. In versions prior to 3.9.7, the requests.get() request in the _check_url method is specified as allow_redirects=True, which allows a server-side request forgery when a request to .well-known/assetlinks.json" returns a 302 redirect. This is a bypass of the fix for CVE-2024-29190 and is fixed in 3.9.7.
Aliases
{ "affected": [ { "package": { "ecosystem": "PyPI", "name": "mobsf", "purl": "pkg:pypi/mobsf" }, "ranges": [ { "events": [ { "introduced": "0" }, { "fixed": "f22c584aa7d43527970c9da61eb678953cfc0a8e" } ], "repo": "https://github.com/mobsf/mobile-security-framework-mobsf", "type": "GIT" }, { "events": [ { "introduced": "0" }, { "fixed": "3.9.7" } ], "type": "ECOSYSTEM" } ], "versions": [ "3.2.6", "3.2.7", "3.2.8", "3.2.9", "3.3.3", "3.3.5", "3.4.0", "3.4.3", "3.4.6", "3.5.0", "3.6.0", "3.6.9", "3.7.6" ] } ], "aliases": [ "CVE-2024-54000", "GHSA-m435-9v6r-v5f6" ], "details": "Mobile Security Framework (MobSF) is a pen-testing, malware analysis and security assessment framework capable of performing static and dynamic analysis. In versions prior to 3.9.7, the requests.get() request in the _check_url method is specified as allow_redirects=True, which allows a server-side request forgery when a request to .well-known/assetlinks.json\" returns a 302 redirect. This is a bypass of the fix for CVE-2024-29190 and is fixed in 3.9.7.", "id": "PYSEC-2024-256", "modified": "2025-06-27T17:22:53.325430+00:00", "published": "2024-12-03T16:15:24+00:00", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://github.com/MobSF/Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF/security/advisories/GHSA-m435-9v6r-v5f6" }, { "type": "FIX", "url": "https://github.com/MobSF/Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF/commit/f22c584aa7d43527970c9da61eb678953cfc0a8e" } ] }
Loading...
Loading...
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.