pysec - pysec-2024-157

pysec-2024-157

Vulnerability from pysec

Published

2024-12-06 12:15

Modified

2025-01-14 05:22

Details

An issue was discovered in Django 5.1 before 5.1.4, 5.0 before 5.0.10, and 4.2 before 4.2.17. Direct usage of the django.db.models.fields.json.HasKey lookup, when an Oracle database is used, is subject to SQL injection if untrusted data is used as an lhs value. (Applications that use the jsonfield.has_key lookup via __ are unaffected.)

Aliases

CVE-2024-53908

To clipboard

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "PyPI",
        "name": "django",
        "purl": "pkg:pypi/django"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "5.1"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "5.1.4"
            },
            {
              "introduced": "5.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "5.0.10"
            },
            {
              "introduced": "4.2"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "4.2.17"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ],
      "versions": [
        "4.2",
        "4.2.1",
        "4.2.10",
        "4.2.11",
        "4.2.12",
        "4.2.13",
        "4.2.14",
        "4.2.15",
        "4.2.16",
        "4.2.2",
        "4.2.3",
        "4.2.4",
        "4.2.5",
        "4.2.6",
        "4.2.7",
        "4.2.8",
        "4.2.9",
        "5.0",
        "5.0.1",
        "5.0.2",
        "5.0.3",
        "5.0.4",
        "5.0.5",
        "5.0.6",
        "5.0.7",
        "5.0.8",
        "5.0.9",
        "5.1",
        "5.1.1",
        "5.1.2",
        "5.1.3"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2024-53908"
  ],
  "details": "An issue was discovered in Django 5.1 before 5.1.4, 5.0 before 5.0.10, and 4.2 before 4.2.17. Direct usage of the django.db.models.fields.json.HasKey lookup, when an Oracle database is used, is subject to SQL injection if untrusted data is used as an lhs value. (Applications that use the jsonfield.has_key lookup via __ are unaffected.)",
  "id": "PYSEC-2024-157",
  "modified": "2025-01-14T05:22:11.817473+00:00",
  "published": "2024-12-06T12:15:18+00:00",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/releases/security/"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://groups.google.com/g/django-announce"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/12/04/3"
    }
  ]
}

cve-2024-53908

Vulnerability from cvelistv5

Published

2024-12-06 00:00

Modified

2024-12-06 16:22

Severity ?

9.8 (Critical) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Summary

An issue was discovered in Django 5.1 before 5.1.4, 5.0 before 5.0.10, and 4.2 before 4.2.17. Direct usage of the django.db.models.fields.json.HasKey lookup, when an Oracle database is used, is subject to SQL injection if untrusted data is used as an lhs value. (Applications that use the jsonfield.has_key lookup via __ are unaffected.)

References

▼	URL	Tags
	https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/releases/security/
	https://groups.google.com/g/django-announce
	https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/12/04/3

Impacted products

▼	Vendor	Product
	n/a	n/a

Show details on NVD website

To clipboard

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "affected": [
          {
            "cpes": [
              "cpe:2.3:a:djangoproject:django:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
            ],
            "defaultStatus": "unknown",
            "product": "django",
            "vendor": "djangoproject",
            "versions": [
              {
                "lessThan": "5.1.4",
                "status": "affected",
                "version": "5.1",
                "versionType": "custom"
              },
              {
                "lessThan": "5.0.10",
                "status": "affected",
                "version": "5.0",
                "versionType": "custom"
              },
              {
                "lessThan": "4.2.17",
                "status": "affected",
                "version": "4.2",
                "versionType": "custom"
              }
            ]
          }
        ],
        "metrics": [
          {
            "cvssV3_1": {
              "attackComplexity": "LOW",
              "attackVector": "NETWORK",
              "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
              "baseScore": 9.8,
              "baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
              "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
              "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
              "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
              "scope": "UNCHANGED",
              "userInteraction": "NONE",
              "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
              "version": "3.1"
            }
          },
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2024-53908",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "yes"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "total"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2024-12-06T16:19:13.745984Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "problemTypes": [
          {
            "descriptions": [
              {
                "cweId": "CWE-89",
                "description": "CWE-89 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command (\u0027SQL Injection\u0027)",
                "lang": "en",
                "type": "CWE"
              }
            ]
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2024-12-06T16:22:02.446Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "n/a",
          "vendor": "n/a",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "n/a"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "An issue was discovered in Django 5.1 before 5.1.4, 5.0 before 5.0.10, and 4.2 before 4.2.17. Direct usage of the django.db.models.fields.json.HasKey lookup, when an Oracle database is used, is subject to SQL injection if untrusted data is used as an lhs value. (Applications that use the jsonfield.has_key lookup via __ are unaffected.)"
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "description": "n/a",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "text"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2024-12-06T11:44:46.815402",
        "orgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
        "shortName": "mitre"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "url": "https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/releases/security/"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://groups.google.com/g/django-announce"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/12/04/3"
        }
      ]
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
    "assignerShortName": "mitre",
    "cveId": "CVE-2024-53908",
    "datePublished": "2024-12-06T00:00:00",
    "dateReserved": "2024-11-24T00:00:00",
    "dateUpdated": "2024-12-06T16:22:02.446Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1"
}

Log in or create an account to share your comment.

Tags

Taxonomy of the tags.

All sightings related to this event Export sightings related to this event

Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.