pysec-2019-118
Vulnerability from pysec
Published
2019-10-03 20:15
Modified
2020-08-24 17:37
Details

In RPyC 4.1.x through 4.1.1, a remote attacker can dynamically modify object attributes to construct a remote procedure call that executes code for an RPyC service with default configuration settings.




{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "PyPI",
        "name": "rpyc",
        "purl": "pkg:pypi/rpyc"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "4.1.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "4.1.2"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ],
      "versions": [
        "4.1.0",
        "4.1.1"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2019-16328",
    "GHSA-9ggp-4jpr-7ppj",
    "GHSA-pj4g-4488-wmxm"
  ],
  "details": "In RPyC 4.1.x through 4.1.1, a remote attacker can dynamically modify object attributes to construct a remote procedure call that executes code for an RPyC service with default configuration settings.",
  "id": "PYSEC-2019-118",
  "modified": "2020-08-24T17:37:00Z",
  "published": "2019-10-03T20:15:00Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://rpyc.readthedocs.io/en/latest/docs/security.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/tomerfiliba/rpyc"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-05/msg00046.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-06/msg00004.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-9ggp-4jpr-7ppj"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-pj4g-4488-wmxm"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading...

Loading...

Loading...
  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.