pysec-2015-11
Vulnerability from pysec
Published
2015-12-07 20:59
Modified
2021-09-01 08:35
Details

The get_format function in utils/formats.py in Django before 1.7.x before 1.7.11, 1.8.x before 1.8.7, and 1.9.x before 1.9rc2 might allow remote attackers to obtain sensitive application secrets via a settings key in place of a date/time format setting, as demonstrated by SECRET_KEY.

Aliases


To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "PyPI",
        "name": "django",
        "purl": "pkg:pypi/django"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "316bc3fc9437c5960c24baceb93c73f1939711e4"
            }
          ],
          "repo": "https://github.com/django/django",
          "type": "GIT"
        },
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "1.7.11"
            },
            {
              "introduced": "1.8"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "1.8.7"
            },
            {
              "introduced": "1.9a0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "1.9rc2"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ],
      "versions": [
        "1.0.1",
        "1.0.2",
        "1.0.3",
        "1.0.4",
        "1.1",
        "1.1.1",
        "1.1.2",
        "1.1.3",
        "1.1.4",
        "1.2",
        "1.2.1",
        "1.2.2",
        "1.2.3",
        "1.2.4",
        "1.2.5",
        "1.2.6",
        "1.2.7",
        "1.3",
        "1.3.1",
        "1.3.2",
        "1.3.3",
        "1.3.4",
        "1.3.5",
        "1.3.6",
        "1.3.7",
        "1.4",
        "1.4.1",
        "1.4.10",
        "1.4.11",
        "1.4.12",
        "1.4.13",
        "1.4.14",
        "1.4.15",
        "1.4.16",
        "1.4.17",
        "1.4.18",
        "1.4.19",
        "1.4.2",
        "1.4.20",
        "1.4.21",
        "1.4.22",
        "1.4.3",
        "1.4.4",
        "1.4.5",
        "1.4.6",
        "1.4.7",
        "1.4.8",
        "1.4.9",
        "1.5",
        "1.5.1",
        "1.5.10",
        "1.5.11",
        "1.5.12",
        "1.5.2",
        "1.5.3",
        "1.5.4",
        "1.5.5",
        "1.5.6",
        "1.5.7",
        "1.5.8",
        "1.5.9",
        "1.6",
        "1.6.1",
        "1.6.10",
        "1.6.11",
        "1.6.2",
        "1.6.3",
        "1.6.4",
        "1.6.5",
        "1.6.6",
        "1.6.7",
        "1.6.8",
        "1.6.9",
        "1.7",
        "1.7.1",
        "1.7.10",
        "1.7.2",
        "1.7.3",
        "1.7.4",
        "1.7.5",
        "1.7.6",
        "1.7.7",
        "1.7.8",
        "1.7.9",
        "1.8",
        "1.8.1",
        "1.8.2",
        "1.8.3",
        "1.8.4",
        "1.8.5",
        "1.8.6",
        "1.9a1",
        "1.9b1",
        "1.9rc1"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2015-8213"
  ],
  "details": "The get_format function in utils/formats.py in Django before 1.7.x before 1.7.11, 1.8.x before 1.8.7, and 1.9.x before 1.9rc2 might allow remote attackers to obtain sensitive application secrets via a settings key in place of a date/time format setting, as demonstrated by SECRET_KEY.",
  "id": "PYSEC-2015-11",
  "modified": "2021-09-01T08:35:41.190803Z",
  "published": "2015-12-07T20:59:00Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ARTICLE",
      "url": "https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2015/nov/24/security-releases-issued/"
    },
    {
      "type": "FIX",
      "url": "https://github.com/django/django/commit/316bc3fc9437c5960c24baceb93c73f1939711e4"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-2816-1"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/77750"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-0156.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-0158.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-0129.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-0157.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1034237"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-December/174770.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2015-12/msg00017.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2015/dsa-3404"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-December/173375.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2015-12/msg00014.html"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.