pysec-2009-4
Vulnerability from pysec
Published
2009-10-13 10:30
Modified
2021-07-15 02:22
Details
Algorithmic complexity vulnerability in the forms library in Django 1.0 before 1.0.4 and 1.1 before 1.1.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption) via a crafted (1) EmailField (email address) or (2) URLField (URL) that triggers a large amount of backtracking in a regular expression.
Aliases
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "PyPI",
"name": "django",
"purl": "pkg:pypi/django"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "1.0"
},
{
"fixed": "1.0.4"
},
{
"introduced": "1.1"
},
{
"fixed": "1.1.1"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
],
"versions": [
"1.0.1",
"1.0.2",
"1.0.3",
"1.1"
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2009-3695"
],
"details": "Algorithmic complexity vulnerability in the forms library in Django 1.0 before 1.0.4 and 1.1 before 1.1.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption) via a crafted (1) EmailField (email address) or (2) URLField (URL) that triggers a large amount of backtracking in a regular expression.",
"id": "PYSEC-2009-4",
"modified": "2021-07-15T02:22:07.960103Z",
"published": "2009-10-13T10:30:00Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/36655"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://groups.google.com/group/django-users/browse_thread/thread/15df9e45118dfc51/"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/36948"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2009/dsa-1905"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=550457"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2009/2871"
},
{
"type": "ARTICLE",
"url": "http://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2009/oct/09/security/"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/36968"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2009/10/13/6"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/53727"
}
]
}
Loading...
Loading...
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.