jvndb-2025-003213
Vulnerability from jvndb
Published
2025-04-11 13:52
Modified
2025-04-11 13:52
Severity ?
Summary
TP-Link Deco BE65 Pro vulnerable to OS command injection
Details
Deco BE65 Pro provided by TP-LINK contains an OS command injection vulnerability (CWE-78).
Chuya Hayakawa and Ryo Kamino of 00One, Inc. reported this vulnerability to JPCERT/CC.
JPCERT/CC coordinated with the developer.
References
▼ | Type | URL |
---|---|---|
JVN | https://jvn.jp/en/vu/JVNVU94912671/index.html | |
CVE | https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-32107 | |
OS Command Injection(CWE-78) | https://www.ipa.go.jp/en/security/vulnerabilities/cwe.html |
Impacted products
▼ | Vendor | Product |
---|---|---|
TP-LINK Technologies | Deco BE65 Pro |
{ "@rdf:about": "https://jvndb.jvn.jp/en/contents/2025/JVNDB-2025-003213.html", "dc:date": "2025-04-11T13:52+09:00", "dcterms:issued": "2025-04-11T13:52+09:00", "dcterms:modified": "2025-04-11T13:52+09:00", "description": "Deco BE65 Pro provided by TP-LINK contains an OS command injection vulnerability (CWE-78).\r\n\r\nChuya Hayakawa and Ryo Kamino of 00One, Inc. reported this vulnerability to JPCERT/CC.\r\nJPCERT/CC coordinated with the developer.", "link": "https://jvndb.jvn.jp/en/contents/2025/JVNDB-2025-003213.html", "sec:cpe": { "#text": "cpe:/o:tp-link:deco_be65_pro", "@product": "Deco BE65 Pro", "@vendor": "TP-LINK Technologies", "@version": "2.2" }, "sec:cvss": { "@score": "8.0", "@severity": "High", "@type": "Base", "@vector": "CVSS:3.0/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "@version": "3.0" }, "sec:identifier": "JVNDB-2025-003213", "sec:references": [ { "#text": "https://jvn.jp/en/vu/JVNVU94912671/index.html", "@id": "JVNVU#94912671", "@source": "JVN" }, { "#text": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-32107", "@id": "CVE-2025-32107", "@source": "CVE" }, { "#text": "https://www.ipa.go.jp/en/security/vulnerabilities/cwe.html", "@id": "CWE-78", "@title": "OS Command Injection(CWE-78)" } ], "title": "TP-Link Deco BE65 Pro vulnerable to OS command injection" }
Loading...
Loading...
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.