jvndb-2017-005208
Vulnerability from jvndb
Published
2017-07-21 13:39
Modified
2018-02-14 13:44
Severity ?
Summary
gSOAP vulnerable to stack-based buffer overflow
Details
gSOAP library provided by Genivia contains a stack-based buffer overflow(CWE-121). Processing a crafted SOAP message sent by a remote attacker may result in code execution.
References
{ "@rdf:about": "https://jvndb.jvn.jp/en/contents/2017/JVNDB-2017-005208.html", "dc:date": "2018-02-14T13:44+09:00", "dcterms:issued": "2017-07-21T13:39+09:00", "dcterms:modified": "2018-02-14T13:44+09:00", "description": "gSOAP library provided by Genivia contains a stack-based buffer overflow(CWE-121). Processing a crafted SOAP message sent by a remote attacker may result in code execution.", "link": "https://jvndb.jvn.jp/en/contents/2017/JVNDB-2017-005208.html", "sec:cpe": { "#text": "cpe:/a:genivia:gsoap", "@product": "gSOAP", "@vendor": "Genivia", "@version": "2.2" }, "sec:cvss": [ { "@score": "7.5", "@severity": "High", "@type": "Base", "@vector": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P", "@version": "2.0" }, { "@score": "7.3", "@severity": "High", "@type": "Base", "@vector": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L", "@version": "3.0" } ], "sec:identifier": "JVNDB-2017-005208", "sec:references": [ { "#text": "http://jvn.jp/en/vu/JVNVU98807587/index.html", "@id": "JVNVU#98807587", "@source": "JVN" }, { "#text": "https://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=2017-9765", "@id": "CVE-2017-9765", "@source": "CVE" }, { "#text": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-9765", "@id": "CVE-2017-9765", "@source": "NVD" }, { "#text": "http://blog.senr.io/blog/devils-ivy-flaw-in-widely-used-third-party-code-impacts-millions", "@id": "Senrio Blog - Devil\u0027s Ivy: Flaw in Widely Used Third-party Code Impacts Millions", "@source": "Related document" }, { "#text": "http://blog.senr.io/devilsivy.html", "@id": "Devil\u0027s Ivy", "@source": "Related document" } ], "title": "gSOAP vulnerable to stack-based buffer overflow" }
Loading...
Loading...
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.