gsd-2022-23092
Vulnerability from gsd
Modified
2023-12-13 01:19
Details
The implementation of lib9p's handling of RWALK messages was missing a bounds check needed when unpacking the message contents. The missing check means that the receipt of a specially crafted message will cause lib9p to overwrite unrelated memory.
The bug can be triggered by a malicious bhyve guest kernel to overwrite memory in the bhyve(8) process. This could potentially lead to user-mode code execution on the host, subject to bhyve's Capsicum sandbox.
Aliases
Aliases
{ "GSD": { "alias": "CVE-2022-23092", "id": "GSD-2022-23092" }, "gsd": { "metadata": { "exploitCode": "unknown", "remediation": "unknown", "reportConfidence": "confirmed", "type": "vulnerability" }, "osvSchema": { "aliases": [ "CVE-2022-23092" ], "details": "The implementation of lib9p\u0027s handling of RWALK messages was missing a bounds check needed when unpacking the message contents. The missing check means that the receipt of a specially crafted message will cause lib9p to overwrite unrelated memory.\n\nThe bug can be triggered by a malicious bhyve guest kernel to overwrite memory in the bhyve(8) process. This could potentially lead to user-mode code execution on the host, subject to bhyve\u0027s Capsicum sandbox.", "id": "GSD-2022-23092", "modified": "2023-12-13T01:19:35.092869Z", "schema_version": "1.4.0" } }, "namespaces": { "cve.org": { "CVE_data_meta": { "ASSIGNER": "secteam@freebsd.org", "ID": "CVE-2022-23092", "STATE": "PUBLIC" }, "affects": { "vendor": { "vendor_data": [ { "product": { "product_data": [ { "product_name": "FreeBSD", "version": { "version_data": [ { "version_affected": "\u003c", "version_name": "13.1-RELEASE", "version_value": "p1" }, { "version_affected": "\u003c", "version_name": "13.0-RELEASE", "version_value": "p12" } ] } } ] }, "vendor_name": "FreeBSD" } ] } }, "credits": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "Robert Morris" } ], "data_format": "MITRE", "data_type": "CVE", "data_version": "4.0", "description": { "description_data": [ { "lang": "eng", "value": "The implementation of lib9p\u0027s handling of RWALK messages was missing a bounds check needed when unpacking the message contents. The missing check means that the receipt of a specially crafted message will cause lib9p to overwrite unrelated memory.\n\nThe bug can be triggered by a malicious bhyve guest kernel to overwrite memory in the bhyve(8) process. This could potentially lead to user-mode code execution on the host, subject to bhyve\u0027s Capsicum sandbox." } ] }, "generator": { "engine": "Vulnogram 0.1.0-dev" }, "problemtype": { "problemtype_data": [ { "description": [ { "lang": "eng", "value": "n/a" } ] } ] }, "references": { "reference_data": [ { "name": "https://security.freebsd.org/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-22:12.lib9p.asc", "refsource": "MISC", "url": "https://security.freebsd.org/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-22:12.lib9p.asc" }, { "name": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20240415-0009/", "refsource": "MISC", "url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20240415-0009/" } ] }, "source": { "discovery": "UNKNOWN" } }, "nvd.nist.gov": { "cve": { "descriptions": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "The implementation of lib9p\u0027s handling of RWALK messages was missing a bounds check needed when unpacking the message contents. The missing check means that the receipt of a specially crafted message will cause lib9p to overwrite unrelated memory.\n\nThe bug can be triggered by a malicious bhyve guest kernel to overwrite memory in the bhyve(8) process. This could potentially lead to user-mode code execution on the host, subject to bhyve\u0027s Capsicum sandbox." } ], "id": "CVE-2022-23092", "lastModified": "2024-02-15T06:23:39.303", "metrics": {}, "published": "2024-02-15T06:15:45.190", "references": [ { "source": "secteam@freebsd.org", "url": "https://security.freebsd.org/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-22:12.lib9p.asc" } ], "sourceIdentifier": "secteam@freebsd.org", "vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis" } } } }
Loading...
Loading...
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.