ghsa-wpwj-69cm-q9c5
Vulnerability from github
Published
2025-09-29 16:28
Modified
2025-09-30 15:15
Summary
go-mail has insufficient address encoding when passing mail addresses to the SMTP client
Details

Impact

Due to incorrect handling of the mail.Address values when a sender- or recipient address is passed to the corresponding MAIL FROM or RCPT TO commands of the SMTP client, this could lead to a possible wrong address routing or even to ESMTP parameter smuggling.

Vulnerability details

Instead of making use of the String() method of mail.Address, which takes care of proper escaping and quotation of mail address, we used the Address value of the mail.Address which is the raw value when passing it to our SMTP client.

This meant, if a mail address like this was set: "toni.tester@example.com> ORCPT=admin@admin.com"@example.com for a sender or recipient, instead of the correctly quoted/escaped address, the SMTP client would get the raw value passed which would translate into something like this being passed to the SMTP server: RCPT TO:<toni.tester@example.com> ORCPT=admin@admin.com@example.com>.

Since ORCTP is a valid command for the SMTP server, the mail would be routed to the wrong address. Additionally, other SMTP commands could potientially be smuggled in using this method causing unexpected behaviour.

Exploitation requirements

For successful exploitation of this vulnerability it is required that the user's code is allowing for arbitrary mail address input (i. e. through a web form or similar). If only static mail addresses are used (i. e. in a config file) and the mail addresses in use do not consist of quoted local parts, this should not affect your code.

Patches

The vulnerability has been fixed with PR #496 and the fix has been shipped with the go-mail v0.7.1 release.

Issue #495 holds the full report and discussion.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Go",
        "name": "github.com/wneessen/go-mail"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "0.7.1"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-59937"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-88"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2025-09-29T16:28:58Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-09-29T23:15:31Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "### Impact\nDue to incorrect handling of the `mail.Address` values when a sender- or recipient address is passed to the corresponding `MAIL FROM` or `RCPT TO` commands of the SMTP client, this could lead to a possible wrong address routing or even to ESMTP parameter smuggling.\n\n#### Vulnerability details\nInstead of making use of the `String()` method of `mail.Address`, which takes care of proper escaping and quotation of mail address, we used the `Address` value of the `mail.Address` which is the raw value when passing it to our SMTP client.\n\nThis meant, if a mail address like this was set: `\"toni.tester@example.com\u003e ORCPT=admin@admin.com\"@example.com` for a sender or recipient, instead of the correctly quoted/escaped address, the SMTP client would get the raw value passed which would translate into something like this being passed to the SMTP server: `RCPT TO:\u003ctoni.tester@example.com\u003e ORCPT=admin@admin.com@example.com\u003e`. \n\nSince ORCTP is a valid command for the SMTP server, the mail would be routed to the wrong address. Additionally, other SMTP commands could potientially be smuggled in using this method causing unexpected behaviour.\n\n#### Exploitation requirements\nFor successful exploitation of this vulnerability it is required that the user\u0027s code is allowing for arbitrary mail address input (i. e. through a web form or similar). If only static mail addresses are used (i. e. in a config file) and the mail addresses in use do not consist of quoted local parts, this should not affect your code.\n\n### Patches\nThe vulnerability has been fixed with PR #496 and the fix has been shipped with the go-mail v0.7.1 release.\n\nIssue #495 holds the full report and discussion.",
  "id": "GHSA-wpwj-69cm-q9c5",
  "modified": "2025-09-30T15:15:13Z",
  "published": "2025-09-29T16:28:58Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/wneessen/go-mail/security/advisories/GHSA-wpwj-69cm-q9c5"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-59937"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/wneessen/go-mail/issues/495"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/wneessen/go-mail/pull/496"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/wneessen/go-mail/commit/42e92cfe027be04aff72921adb0f72f11d517479"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/wneessen/go-mail"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "go-mail has insufficient address encoding when passing mail addresses to the SMTP client"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading...

Loading...

Loading...
  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.