ghsa-v676-f8gm-92r9
Vulnerability from github
Published
2025-09-12 06:30
Modified
2025-09-12 18:31
Severity ?
Details
- A cookie is set using the
secure
keyword forhttps://target
- curl is redirected to or otherwise made to speak with
http://target
(same hostname, but using clear text HTTP) using the same cookie set - The same cookie name is set - but with just a slash as path (
path='/'
). Since this site is not secure, the cookie should just be ignored. - A bug in the path comparison logic makes curl read outside a heap buffer boundary
The bug either causes a crash or it potentially makes the comparison come to the wrong conclusion and lets the clear-text site override the contents of the secure cookie, contrary to expectations and depending on the memory contents immediately following the single-byte allocation that holds the path.
The presumed and correct behavior would be to plainly ignore the second set of the cookie since it was already set as secure on a secure host so overriding it on an insecure host should not be okay.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2025-9086" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2025-09-12T06:15:44Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "1. A cookie is set using the `secure` keyword for `https://target`\n2. curl is redirected to or otherwise made to speak with `http://target` (same\n hostname, but using clear text HTTP) using the same cookie set\n3. The same cookie name is set - but with just a slash as path (`path=\u0027/\u0027`).\n Since this site is not secure, the cookie *should* just be ignored.\n4. A bug in the path comparison logic makes curl read outside a heap buffer\n boundary\n\nThe bug either causes a crash or it potentially makes the comparison come to\nthe wrong conclusion and lets the clear-text site override the contents of the\nsecure cookie, contrary to expectations and depending on the memory contents\nimmediately following the single-byte allocation that holds the path.\n\nThe presumed and correct behavior would be to plainly ignore the second set of\nthe cookie since it was already set as secure on a secure host so overriding\nit on an insecure host should not be okay.", "id": "GHSA-v676-f8gm-92r9", "modified": "2025-09-12T18:31:09Z", "published": "2025-09-12T06:30:26Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-9086" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://hackerone.com/reports/3294999" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://curl.se/docs/CVE-2025-9086.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://curl.se/docs/CVE-2025-9086.json" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ] }
Loading...
Loading...
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.