ghsa-q465-4cr6-rp76
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 19:57
Modified
2022-05-17 19:57
Details

FusionForge before 5.3.2 use scripts that run under the shared Apache user, which is also used by project homepages by default. If project webpages are hosted on the same server than FusionForge, it can allow users to incorrectly access on-disk private data in FusionForge.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2014-6275"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2020-01-02T22:15:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "FusionForge before 5.3.2 use scripts that run under the shared Apache user, which is also used by project homepages by default. If project webpages are hosted on the same server than FusionForge, it can allow users to incorrectly access on-disk private data in FusionForge.",
  "id": "GHSA-q465-4cr6-rp76",
  "modified": "2022-05-17T19:57:12Z",
  "published": "2022-05-17T19:57:12Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2014-6275"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2014-6275"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://lists.fusionforge.org/pipermail/fusionforge-general/2014-September/002824.html"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading...

Loading...

Loading...
  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.