ghsa-p6jr-6crg-pfcj
Vulnerability from github
Published
2025-07-11 18:30
Modified
2025-07-11 18:30
Details

A Use of Incorrect Byte Ordering

vulnerability

in the Routing Protocol Daemon (rpd) of Juniper Networks Junos OS on SRX300 Series allows an unauthenticated, network-based attacker to cause a Denial-of-Service (DoS).

When a BGP update is received over an established BGP session which contains a specific, valid, optional, transitive path attribute, rpd will crash and restart.

This issue affects eBGP and iBGP over IPv4 and IPv6.

This issue affects:

Junos OS:

  • 22.1 versions from 22.1R1 before 22.2R3-S4,
  • 22.3 versions before 22.3R3-S3,
  • 22.4 versions before 22.4R3-S2,
  • 23.2 versions before 23.2R2,
  • 23.4 versions before 23.4R2.
Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-52980"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-198"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-07-11T16:15:24Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "A Use of Incorrect Byte Ordering \n\nvulnerability \n\nin the Routing Protocol Daemon (rpd) of Juniper Networks Junos OS on SRX300 Series allows an unauthenticated, network-based attacker to cause a Denial-of-Service (DoS).\n\n\n\nWhen a\u00a0BGP update is received over an established BGP session which contains a specific, valid, optional, transitive path attribute, rpd will crash and restart.\n\nThis issue affects eBGP and iBGP over IPv4 and IPv6.\n\n\n\nThis issue affects:\n\nJunos OS:\n\n\n\n  *  22.1 versions from 22.1R1 before 22.2R3-S4,\n  *  22.3 versions before 22.3R3-S3,\n  *  22.4 versions before 22.4R3-S2,\n  *  23.2 versions before 23.2R2,\n  *  23.4 versions before 23.4R2.",
  "id": "GHSA-p6jr-6crg-pfcj",
  "modified": "2025-07-11T18:30:33Z",
  "published": "2025-07-11T18:30:33Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-52980"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://supportportal.juniper.net/JSA100084"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    },
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:L/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:Y/R:A/V:X/RE:M/U:X",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading...

Loading...

Loading...
  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.