ghsa-m6ch-qxrg-ggw6
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 00:13
Modified
2025-04-11 03:56
Details

Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in swfupload.swf in SWFupload 2.2.0.1 and earlier, as used in WordPress before 3.5.2, TinyMCE Image Manager 1.1 and earlier, and other products allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the buttonText parameter, a different vulnerability than CVE-2012-3414.

Show details on source website

To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2012-2399"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2012-04-21T23:55:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in swfupload.swf in SWFupload 2.2.0.1 and earlier, as used in WordPress before 3.5.2, TinyMCE Image Manager 1.1 and earlier, and other products allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the buttonText parameter, a different vulnerability than CVE-2012-3414.",
  "id": "GHSA-m6ch-qxrg-ggw6",
  "modified": "2025-04-11T03:56:55Z",
  "published": "2022-05-17T00:13:29Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2012-2399"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/75210"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://core.trac.wordpress.org/browser/branches/3.3/wp-includes/js/swfupload/swfupload.swf?rev=20503"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://jvn.jp/en/jp/JVN25280162/index.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://jvndb.jvn.jp/jvndb/JVNDB-2012-002110"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://make.wordpress.org/core/2013/06/21/secure-swfupload"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://osvdb.org/81459"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/120746/SWFUpload-Content-Spoofing-Cross-Site-Scripting.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/122399/tinymce11-xss.txt"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2013/Mar/110"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/49138"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://wordpress.org/news/2012/04/wordpress-3-3-2"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2012/dsa-2470"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2013/07/18/13"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.osvdb.org/91134"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/53192"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.