ghsa-j5qc-xcfm-cq6p
Vulnerability from github
Published
2025-04-18 15:31
Modified
2025-04-29 18:30
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

sfc: fix NULL dereferences in ef100_process_design_param()

Since cited commit, ef100_probe_main() and hence also ef100_check_design_params() run before efx->net_dev is created; consequently, we cannot netif_set_tso_max_size() or _segs() at this point. Move those netif calls to ef100_probe_netdev(), and also replace netif_err within the design params code with pci_err.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-37860"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-476"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-04-18T07:15:42Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nsfc: fix NULL dereferences in ef100_process_design_param()\n\nSince cited commit, ef100_probe_main() and hence also\n ef100_check_design_params() run before efx-\u003enet_dev is created;\n consequently, we cannot netif_set_tso_max_size() or _segs() at this\n point.\nMove those netif calls to ef100_probe_netdev(), and also replace\n netif_err within the design params code with pci_err.",
  "id": "GHSA-j5qc-xcfm-cq6p",
  "modified": "2025-04-29T18:30:52Z",
  "published": "2025-04-18T15:31:37Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-37860"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8241ecec1cdc6699ae197d52d58e76bddd995fa5"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e56391011381d6d029da377a65ac314cb3d5def2"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading...

Loading...

Loading...
  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.