ghsa-j5hm-v5hc-jgjr
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-04-30 18:23
Modified
2025-04-11 03:53
Details

The Cascading Style Sheets (CSS) implementation in Mozilla Firefox before 4.0, Thunderbird before 3.3, and SeaMonkey before 2.1 does not properly handle the :visited pseudo-class, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information about visited web pages via a crafted HTML document, a related issue to CVE-2010-2264.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2002-2436"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-200"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2011-12-07T19:55:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "The Cascading Style Sheets (CSS) implementation in Mozilla Firefox before 4.0, Thunderbird before 3.3, and SeaMonkey before 2.1 does not properly handle the :visited pseudo-class, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information about visited web pages via a crafted HTML document, a related issue to CVE-2010-2264.",
  "id": "GHSA-j5hm-v5hc-jgjr",
  "modified": "2025-04-11T03:53:13Z",
  "published": "2022-04-30T18:23:12Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2002-2436"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://developer.mozilla.org/en/CSS/Privacy_and_the_:visited_selector"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/71816"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://blog.mozilla.com/security/2010/03/31/plugging-the-css-history-leak"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=147777"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://w2spconf.com/2010/papers/p26.pdf"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading...

Loading...

Loading...
  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.