ghsa-j5hm-v5hc-jgjr
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-04-30 18:23
Modified
2025-04-11 03:53
Details
The Cascading Style Sheets (CSS) implementation in Mozilla Firefox before 4.0, Thunderbird before 3.3, and SeaMonkey before 2.1 does not properly handle the :visited pseudo-class, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information about visited web pages via a crafted HTML document, a related issue to CVE-2010-2264.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2002-2436" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-200" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2011-12-07T19:55:00Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "The Cascading Style Sheets (CSS) implementation in Mozilla Firefox before 4.0, Thunderbird before 3.3, and SeaMonkey before 2.1 does not properly handle the :visited pseudo-class, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information about visited web pages via a crafted HTML document, a related issue to CVE-2010-2264.", "id": "GHSA-j5hm-v5hc-jgjr", "modified": "2025-04-11T03:53:13Z", "published": "2022-04-30T18:23:12Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2002-2436" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://developer.mozilla.org/en/CSS/Privacy_and_the_:visited_selector" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/71816" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://blog.mozilla.com/security/2010/03/31/plugging-the-css-history-leak" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=147777" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://w2spconf.com/2010/papers/p26.pdf" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading...
Loading...
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.