ghsa-h63j-vf47-m3ch
Vulnerability from github
Published
2025-07-17 15:32
Modified
2025-07-17 15:32
Details

When setting up interrupt remapping for legacy PCI(-X) devices, including PCI(-X) bridges, a lookup of the upstream bridge is required. This lookup, itself involving acquiring of a lock, is done in a context where acquiring that lock is unsafe. This can lead to a deadlock.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-1713"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-833"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-07-17T14:15:30Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "When setting up interrupt remapping for legacy PCI(-X) devices,\nincluding PCI(-X) bridges, a lookup of the upstream bridge is required.\nThis lookup, itself involving acquiring of a lock, is done in a context\nwhere acquiring that lock is unsafe.  This can lead to a deadlock.",
  "id": "GHSA-h63j-vf47-m3ch",
  "modified": "2025-07-17T15:32:15Z",
  "published": "2025-07-17T15:32:15Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-1713"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://xenbits.xenproject.org/xsa/advisory-467.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2025/02/27/1"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2025/02/27/3"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2025/02/28/1"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://xenbits.xen.org/xsa/advisory-467.html"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading...

Loading...

Loading...
  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.