ghsa-gxxm-rhpx-j39m
Vulnerability from github
Published
2025-07-10 18:31
Modified
2025-07-15 21:31
Severity ?
Details
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in Apache HTTP Server on Windows allows to potentially leak NTLM hashes to a malicious server via mod_rewrite or apache expressions that pass unvalidated request input.
This issue affects Apache HTTP Server: from 2.4.0 through 2.4.63.
Note: The Apache HTTP Server Project will be setting a higher bar for accepting vulnerability reports regarding SSRF via UNC paths.
The server offers limited protection against administrators directing the server to open UNC paths. Windows servers should limit the hosts they will connect over via SMB based on the nature of NTLM authentication.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2024-43394" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-918" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2025-07-10T17:15:46Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)\u00a0in Apache HTTP Server on Windows allows to potentially leak NTLM hashes to a malicious server via\u00a0\nmod_rewrite or apache expressions that pass unvalidated request input.\n\nThis issue affects Apache HTTP Server: from 2.4.0 through 2.4.63.\n\nNote: \u00a0The Apache HTTP Server Project will be setting a higher bar for accepting vulnerability reports regarding SSRF via UNC paths. \n\nThe server offers limited protection against administrators directing the server to open UNC paths.\nWindows servers should limit the hosts they will connect over via SMB based on the nature of NTLM authentication.", "id": "GHSA-gxxm-rhpx-j39m", "modified": "2025-07-15T21:31:26Z", "published": "2025-07-10T18:31:26Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-43394" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://httpd.apache.org/security/vulnerabilities_24.html" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ] }
Loading...
Loading...
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.