ghsa-gg62-p4px-cw9r
Vulnerability from github
Published
2024-08-17 12:30
Modified
2024-08-17 12:30
Details
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
scsi: lpfc: Revise lpfc_prep_embed_io routine with proper endian macro usages
On big endian architectures, it is possible to run into a memory out of bounds pointer dereference when FCP targets are zoned.
In lpfc_prep_embed_io, the memcpy(ptr, fcp_cmnd, sgl->sge_len) is referencing a little endian formatted sgl->sge_len value. So, the memcpy can cause big endian systems to crash.
Redefine the *sgl ptr as a struct sli4_sge_le to make it clear that we are referring to a little endian formatted data structure. And, update the routine with proper le32_to_cpu macro usages.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2024-43816" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2024-08-17T10:15:07Z", "severity": null }, "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nscsi: lpfc: Revise lpfc_prep_embed_io routine with proper endian macro usages\n\nOn big endian architectures, it is possible to run into a memory out of\nbounds pointer dereference when FCP targets are zoned.\n\nIn lpfc_prep_embed_io, the memcpy(ptr, fcp_cmnd, sgl-\u003esge_len) is\nreferencing a little endian formatted sgl-\u003esge_len value. So, the memcpy\ncan cause big endian systems to crash.\n\nRedefine the *sgl ptr as a struct sli4_sge_le to make it clear that we are\nreferring to a little endian formatted data structure. And, update the\nroutine with proper le32_to_cpu macro usages.", "id": "GHSA-gg62-p4px-cw9r", "modified": "2024-08-17T12:30:32Z", "published": "2024-08-17T12:30:32Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-43816" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8bc7c617642db6d8d20ee671fb6c4513017e7a7e" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9fd003f344d502f65252963169df3dd237054e49" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading...
Loading...
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.