ghsa-fgv5-qx89-qjrh
Vulnerability from github
Published
2024-07-06 18:32
Modified
2024-07-06 18:32
Severity ?
Details
A vulnerability in the /models/apply endpoint of mudler/localai versions 2.15.0 allows for Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) and partial Local File Inclusion (LFI). The endpoint supports both http(s):// and file:// schemes, where the latter can lead to LFI. However, the output is limited due to the length of the error message. This vulnerability can be exploited by an attacker with network access to the LocalAI instance, potentially allowing unauthorized access to internal HTTP(s) servers and partial reading of local files. The issue is fixed in version 2.17.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2024-6095" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-918" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2024-07-06T18:15:02Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "A vulnerability in the /models/apply endpoint of mudler/localai versions 2.15.0 allows for Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) and partial Local File Inclusion (LFI). The endpoint supports both http(s):// and file:// schemes, where the latter can lead to LFI. However, the output is limited due to the length of the error message. This vulnerability can be exploited by an attacker with network access to the LocalAI instance, potentially allowing unauthorized access to internal HTTP(s) servers and partial reading of local files. The issue is fixed in version 2.17.", "id": "GHSA-fgv5-qx89-qjrh", "modified": "2024-07-06T18:32:06Z", "published": "2024-07-06T18:32:06Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-6095" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://github.com/mudler/localai/commit/2fc6fe806b903ac0a70218b21b5c84443a1b0866" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://huntr.com/bounties/4799262d-72dc-43c8-bc99-81d0dce996dc" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ] }
Loading...
Loading...
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.