ghsa-c8r4-j2q4-mjgj
Vulnerability from github
Published
2025-05-01 15:31
Modified
2025-05-01 15:31
Details
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
bpftool: Fix NULL pointer dereference when pin {PROG, MAP, LINK} without FILE
When using bpftool to pin {PROG, MAP, LINK} without FILE, segmentation fault will occur. The reson is that the lack of FILE will cause strlen to trigger NULL pointer dereference. The corresponding stacktrace is shown below:
do_pin do_pin_any do_pin_fd mount_bpffs_for_pin strlen(name) <- NULL pointer dereference
Fix it by adding validation to the common process.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2022-49875" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2025-05-01T15:16:12Z", "severity": null }, "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nbpftool: Fix NULL pointer dereference when pin {PROG, MAP, LINK} without FILE\n\nWhen using bpftool to pin {PROG, MAP, LINK} without FILE,\nsegmentation fault will occur. The reson is that the lack\nof FILE will cause strlen to trigger NULL pointer dereference.\nThe corresponding stacktrace is shown below:\n\ndo_pin\n do_pin_any\n do_pin_fd\n mount_bpffs_for_pin\n strlen(name) \u003c- NULL pointer dereference\n\nFix it by adding validation to the common process.", "id": "GHSA-c8r4-j2q4-mjgj", "modified": "2025-05-01T15:31:51Z", "published": "2025-05-01T15:31:51Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-49875" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/34de8e6e0e1f66e431abf4123934a2581cb5f133" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6dcdd1b68b7f9333d48d48fc77b75e7f235f6a4a" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8c80b2fca4112d724dde477aed13f7b0510a2792" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/da5161ba94c5e9182c301dd4f09c94f715c068bd" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading...
Loading...
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.