ghsa-8823-xphr-qw9v
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 01:36
Modified
2024-11-22 20:12
Summary
Gentoo Portage does not verify X.509 certificates from SSL servers
Details
The urlopen function in pym/portage/util/_urlopen.py in Gentoo Portage 2.1.12, when using HTTPS, does not verify X.509 certificates from SSL servers, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof servers and modify binary package lists via a crafted certificate.
{ "affected": [ { "package": { "ecosystem": "PyPI", "name": "portage" }, "ranges": [ { "events": [ { "introduced": "0" }, { "fixed": "2.1.12.2" } ], "type": "ECOSYSTEM" } ] } ], "aliases": [ "CVE-2013-2100" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": true, "github_reviewed_at": "2024-11-22T20:12:21Z", "nvd_published_at": "2014-09-29T22:55:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "The urlopen function in pym/portage/util/_urlopen.py in Gentoo Portage 2.1.12, when using HTTPS, does not verify X.509 certificates from SSL servers, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof servers and modify binary package lists via a crafted certificate.", "id": "GHSA-8823-xphr-qw9v", "modified": "2024-11-22T20:12:21Z", "published": "2022-05-17T01:36:20Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2013-2100" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=469888" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/84315" }, { "type": "PACKAGE", "url": "https://github.com/gentoo/portage" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://github.com/pypa/advisory-database/tree/main/vulns/portage/PYSEC-2014-115.yaml" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201507-16" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2013/05/15/5" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2013/05/16/3" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [], "summary": "Gentoo Portage does not verify X.509 certificates from SSL servers" }
Loading...
Loading...
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.