ghsa-6fmq-ffq8-9vp9
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-02 03:49
Modified
2022-05-02 03:49
Details
Unspecified vulnerability in the Cluster Management component in IBM PowerHA 5.4, 5.4.1, 5.5, and 6.1 on AIX allows remote attackers to modify the operating-system configuration via packets to the godm port (6177/tcp).
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2009-3900" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2009-11-06T15:30:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "Unspecified vulnerability in the Cluster Management component in IBM PowerHA 5.4, 5.4.1, 5.5, and 6.1 on AIX allows remote attackers to modify the operating-system configuration via packets to the godm port (6177/tcp).", "id": "GHSA-6fmq-ffq8-9vp9", "modified": "2022-05-02T03:49:44Z", "published": "2022-05-02T03:49:44Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2009-3900" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/54154" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://aix.software.ibm.com/aix/efixes/security/haport_advisory.asc" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/37267" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=isg1IZ61323" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=isg1IZ61325" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=isg1IZ62630" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/36931" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2009/3153" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading...
Loading...
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.