ghsa-6749-m5cp-6cg7
Vulnerability from github
Published
2024-02-24 00:30
Modified
2025-04-08 17:53
Severity ?
Summary
Cross-site Scripting in MLFlow
Details
Insufficient sanitization in MLflow leads to XSS when running an untrusted recipe.
This issue leads to a client-side RCE when running an untrusted recipe in Jupyter Notebook.
The vulnerability stems from lack of sanitization over template variables.
{ "affected": [ { "package": { "ecosystem": "PyPI", "name": "mlflow" }, "ranges": [ { "events": [ { "introduced": "0" }, { "fixed": "2.10.0" } ], "type": "ECOSYSTEM" } ] } ], "aliases": [ "CVE-2024-27132" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-79" ], "github_reviewed": true, "github_reviewed_at": "2024-02-26T20:07:33Z", "nvd_published_at": "2024-02-23T22:15:55Z", "severity": "CRITICAL" }, "details": "Insufficient sanitization in MLflow leads to XSS when running an untrusted recipe.\n\nThis issue leads to a client-side RCE when running an untrusted recipe in Jupyter Notebook.\n\nThe vulnerability stems from lack of sanitization over template variables.", "id": "GHSA-6749-m5cp-6cg7", "modified": "2025-04-08T17:53:18Z", "published": "2024-02-24T00:30:20Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-27132" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://github.com/mlflow/mlflow/pull/10873" }, { "type": "PACKAGE", "url": "https://github.com/mlflow/mlflow" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://github.com/pypa/advisory-database/tree/main/vulns/mlflow/PYSEC-2024-240.yaml" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://research.jfrog.com/vulnerabilities/mlflow-untrusted-recipe-xss-jfsa-2024-000631930" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ], "summary": "Cross-site Scripting in MLFlow" }
Loading...
Loading...
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.