ghsa-3h49-76hw-pv6f
Vulnerability from github
Published
2024-08-17 09:30
Modified
2024-09-05 18:30
Severity ?
Details
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
cifs: fix potential null pointer use in destroy_workqueue in init_cifs error path
Dan Carpenter reported a Smack static checker warning: fs/smb/client/cifsfs.c:1981 init_cifs() error: we previously assumed 'serverclose_wq' could be null (see line 1895)
The patch which introduced the serverclose workqueue used the wrong oredering in error paths in init_cifs() for freeing it on errors.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2024-42307" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-476" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2024-08-17T09:15:10Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ncifs: fix potential null pointer use in destroy_workqueue in init_cifs error path\n\nDan Carpenter reported a Smack static checker warning:\n fs/smb/client/cifsfs.c:1981 init_cifs()\n error: we previously assumed \u0027serverclose_wq\u0027 could be null (see line 1895)\n\nThe patch which introduced the serverclose workqueue used the wrong\noredering in error paths in init_cifs() for freeing it on errors.", "id": "GHSA-3h49-76hw-pv6f", "modified": "2024-09-05T18:30:51Z", "published": "2024-08-17T09:30:25Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42307" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/160235efb4f9b55212dedff5de0094c606c4b303" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/193cc89ea0ca1da311877d2b4bb5e9f03bcc82a2" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3739d711246d8fbc95ff73dbdace9741cdce4777" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6018971710fdc7739f8655c1540832b4bb903671" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ] }
Loading...
Loading...
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.