ghsa-339v-wcxr-4xwf
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 02:00
Modified
2022-05-17 02:00
Details

IBM Tivoli Federated Identity Manager (TFIM) and Tivoli Federated Identity Manager Business Gateway (TFIMBG) 6.1.1, 6.2.0, and 6.2.1 do not properly handle signature validations based on SAML 1.0, 1.1, and 2.0, which allows remote attackers to bypass intended authentication or authorization requirements via a non-conforming SAML signature.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2011-1386"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2012-01-04T03:55:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "IBM Tivoli Federated Identity Manager (TFIM) and Tivoli Federated Identity Manager Business Gateway (TFIMBG) 6.1.1, 6.2.0, and 6.2.1 do not properly handle signature validations based on SAML 1.0, 1.1, and 2.0, which allows remote attackers to bypass intended authentication or authorization requirements via a non-conforming SAML signature.",
  "id": "GHSA-339v-wcxr-4xwf",
  "modified": "2022-05-17T02:00:43Z",
  "published": "2022-05-17T02:00:43Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2011-1386"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/71686"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg1IV10793"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg1IV10801"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg1IV10813"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21575309"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading...

Loading...

Loading...
  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.