cve-2025-47774
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2025-05-15 17:38
Modified
2025-05-15 18:33
Severity ?
EPSS score ?
Summary
Vyper's `slice()` may elide side-effects when output length is 0
References
{ "containers": { "adp": [ { "metrics": [ { "other": { "content": { "id": "CVE-2025-47774", "options": [ { "Exploitation": "none" }, { "Automatable": "no" }, { "Technical Impact": "partial" } ], "role": "CISA Coordinator", "timestamp": "2025-05-15T18:33:24.817738Z", "version": "2.0.3" }, "type": "ssvc" } } ], "providerMetadata": { "dateUpdated": "2025-05-15T18:33:29.976Z", "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0", "shortName": "CISA-ADP" }, "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment" } ], "cna": { "affected": [ { "product": "vyper", "vendor": "vyperlang", "versions": [ { "status": "affected", "version": "\u003c= 0.4.2rc1" } ] } ], "descriptions": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "Vyper is the Pythonic Programming Language for the Ethereum Virtual Machine. In versions up to and including 0.4.2rc1, the `slice()` builtin can elide side effects when the output length is 0, and the source bytestring is a builtin (`msg.data` or `\u003caddress\u003e.code`). The reason is that for these source locations, the check that `length \u003e= 1` is skipped. The result is that a 0-length bytestring constructed with slice can be passed to `make_byte_array_copier`, which elides evaluation of its source argument when the max length is 0. The impact is that side effects in the `start` argument may be elided when the `length` argument is 0, e.g. `slice(msg.data, self.do_side_effect(), 0)`. The fix in pull request 4645 disallows any invocation of `slice()` with length 0, including for the ad hoc locations discussed in this advisory. The fix is expected to be part of version 0.4.2." } ], "metrics": [ { "cvssV4_0": { "attackComplexity": "LOW", "attackRequirements": "PRESENT", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "baseScore": 2.9, "baseSeverity": "LOW", "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE", "subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE", "subIntegrityImpact": "NONE", "userInteraction": "NONE", "vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P", "version": "4.0", "vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE", "vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE", "vulnIntegrityImpact": "LOW" } } ], "problemTypes": [ { "descriptions": [ { "cweId": "CWE-691", "description": "CWE-691: Insufficient Control Flow Management", "lang": "en", "type": "CWE" } ] } ], "providerMetadata": { "dateUpdated": "2025-05-15T17:38:58.487Z", "orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa", "shortName": "GitHub_M" }, "references": [ { "name": "https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/security/advisories/GHSA-3vcg-j39x-cwfm", "tags": [ "x_refsource_CONFIRM" ], "url": "https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/security/advisories/GHSA-3vcg-j39x-cwfm" }, { "name": "https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/pull/4645", "tags": [ "x_refsource_MISC" ], "url": "https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/pull/4645" }, { "name": "https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/blob/68b68c4b30c5ef2f312b4674676170b8a6eaa316/vyper/builtins/functions.py#L315-L319", "tags": [ "x_refsource_MISC" ], "url": "https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/blob/68b68c4b30c5ef2f312b4674676170b8a6eaa316/vyper/builtins/functions.py#L315-L319" }, { "name": "https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/blob/68b68c4b30c5ef2f312b4674676170b8a6eaa316/vyper/codegen/core.py#L189-L191", "tags": [ "x_refsource_MISC" ], "url": "https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/blob/68b68c4b30c5ef2f312b4674676170b8a6eaa316/vyper/codegen/core.py#L189-L191" } ], "source": { "advisory": "GHSA-3vcg-j39x-cwfm", "discovery": "UNKNOWN" }, "title": "Vyper\u0027s `slice()` may elide side-effects when output length is 0" } }, "cveMetadata": { "assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa", "assignerShortName": "GitHub_M", "cveId": "CVE-2025-47774", "datePublished": "2025-05-15T17:38:58.487Z", "dateReserved": "2025-05-09T19:49:35.619Z", "dateUpdated": "2025-05-15T18:33:29.976Z", "state": "PUBLISHED" }, "dataType": "CVE_RECORD", "dataVersion": "5.1", "meta": { "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2025-47774\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"published\":\"2025-05-15T18:15:38.440\",\"lastModified\":\"2025-05-16T14:43:26.160\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Awaiting Analysis\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"Vyper is the Pythonic Programming Language for the Ethereum Virtual Machine. In versions up to and including 0.4.2rc1, the `slice()` builtin can elide side effects when the output length is 0, and the source bytestring is a builtin (`msg.data` or `\u003caddress\u003e.code`). The reason is that for these source locations, the check that `length \u003e= 1` is skipped. The result is that a 0-length bytestring constructed with slice can be passed to `make_byte_array_copier`, which elides evaluation of its source argument when the max length is 0. The impact is that side effects in the `start` argument may be elided when the `length` argument is 0, e.g. `slice(msg.data, self.do_side_effect(), 0)`. The fix in pull request 4645 disallows any invocation of `slice()` with length 0, including for the ad hoc locations discussed in this advisory. The fix is expected to be part of version 0.4.2.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"Vyper es el lenguaje de programaci\u00f3n Pythonic para la M\u00e1quina Virtual de Ethereum. En versiones hasta la 0.4.2rc1 (incluida), la instrucci\u00f3n integrada `slice()` puede omitir efectos secundarios cuando la longitud de salida es 0 y la cadena de bytes de origen es una instrucci\u00f3n integrada (`msg.data` o `.code`). Esto se debe a que, para estas ubicaciones de origen, se omite la comprobaci\u00f3n de que `length \u0026gt;= 1`. Como resultado, una cadena de bytes de longitud 0 construida con slice puede pasarse a `make_byte_array_copier`, que omite la evaluaci\u00f3n de su argumento de origen cuando la longitud m\u00e1xima es 0. Esto implica que los efectos secundarios del argumento `start` pueden omitirse cuando el argumento `length` es 0, por ejemplo, `slice(msg.data, self.do_side_effect(), 0)`. La correcci\u00f3n en la solicitud de incorporaci\u00f3n de cambios 4645 impide la invocaci\u00f3n de `slice()` con longitud 0, incluso para las ubicaciones ad hoc descritas en este aviso. Se espera que la soluci\u00f3n sea parte de la versi\u00f3n 0.4.2.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV40\":[{\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"4.0\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X\",\"baseScore\":2.9,\"baseSeverity\":\"LOW\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"attackRequirements\":\"PRESENT\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"vulnConfidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"vulnIntegrityImpact\":\"LOW\",\"vulnAvailabilityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"subConfidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"subIntegrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"subAvailabilityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"exploitMaturity\":\"PROOF_OF_CONCEPT\",\"confidentialityRequirement\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"integrityRequirement\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"availabilityRequirement\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedAttackVector\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedAttackComplexity\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedAttackRequirements\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedPrivilegesRequired\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedUserInteraction\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedVulnConfidentialityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedVulnIntegrityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedVulnAvailabilityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedSubConfidentialityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedSubIntegrityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedSubAvailabilityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"Safety\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"Automatable\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"Recovery\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"valueDensity\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"vulnerabilityResponseEffort\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"providerUrgency\":\"NOT_DEFINED\"}}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-691\"}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/blob/68b68c4b30c5ef2f312b4674676170b8a6eaa316/vyper/builtins/functions.py#L315-L319\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\"},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/blob/68b68c4b30c5ef2f312b4674676170b8a6eaa316/vyper/codegen/core.py#L189-L191\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\"},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/pull/4645\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\"},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/security/advisories/GHSA-3vcg-j39x-cwfm\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\"}]}}" } }
Loading...
Loading...
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.