cve-2025-47256
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2025-05-06 00:00
Modified
2025-05-06 20:27
Severity ?
EPSS score ?
Summary
Libxmp through 4.6.2 has a stack-based buffer overflow in depack_pha in loaders/prowizard/pha.c via a malformed Pha format tracker module in a .mod file.
References
{ "containers": { "adp": [ { "metrics": [ { "other": { "content": { "id": "CVE-2025-47256", "options": [ { "Exploitation": "poc" }, { "Automatable": "no" }, { "Technical Impact": "partial" } ], "role": "CISA Coordinator", "timestamp": "2025-05-06T20:19:35.613431Z", "version": "2.0.3" }, "type": "ssvc" } } ], "providerMetadata": { "dateUpdated": "2025-05-06T20:27:26.395Z", "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0", "shortName": "CISA-ADP" }, "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment" } ], "cna": { "affected": [ { "defaultStatus": "unknown", "product": "Libxmp", "vendor": "Libxmp", "versions": [ { "lessThanOrEqual": "4.6.2", "status": "affected", "version": "0", "versionType": "semver" } ] } ], "descriptions": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "Libxmp through 4.6.2 has a stack-based buffer overflow in depack_pha in loaders/prowizard/pha.c via a malformed Pha format tracker module in a .mod file." } ], "metrics": [ { "cvssV3_1": { "baseScore": 5.6, "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L", "version": "3.1" } } ], "problemTypes": [ { "descriptions": [ { "cweId": "CWE-191", "description": "CWE-191 Integer Underflow (Wrap or Wraparound)", "lang": "en", "type": "CWE" } ] } ], "providerMetadata": { "dateUpdated": "2025-05-06T20:09:12.134Z", "orgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca", "shortName": "mitre" }, "references": [ { "url": "https://github.com/libxmp/libxmp/blob/ec22d1c7b93c8f681f8504a6c61c6f8a52458a10/src/loaders/prowizard/pha.c#L35" }, { "url": "https://github.com/GCatt-AS/CVE-2025-47256" }, { "url": "https://github.com/libxmp/libxmp/issues/847" } ], "x_generator": { "engine": "enrichogram 0.0.1" } } }, "cveMetadata": { "assignerOrgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca", "assignerShortName": "mitre", "cveId": "CVE-2025-47256", "datePublished": "2025-05-06T00:00:00.000Z", "dateReserved": "2025-05-05T00:00:00.000Z", "dateUpdated": "2025-05-06T20:27:26.395Z", "state": "PUBLISHED" }, "dataType": "CVE_RECORD", "dataVersion": "5.1", "meta": { "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2025-47256\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"published\":\"2025-05-06T20:15:27.177\",\"lastModified\":\"2025-05-07T14:13:20.483\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Awaiting Analysis\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"Libxmp through 4.6.2 has a stack-based buffer overflow in depack_pha in loaders/prowizard/pha.c via a malformed Pha format tracker module in a .mod file.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"Desde Libxmp hasta la versi\u00f3n 4.6.2 hay un desbordamiento de b\u00fafer basado en pila en depack_pha en loaders/prowizard/pha.c a trav\u00e9s de un m\u00f3dulo rastreador de formato Pha mal formado en un archivo .mod.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L\",\"baseScore\":5.6,\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"attackVector\":\"LOCAL\",\"attackComplexity\":\"HIGH\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"CHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"LOW\",\"integrityImpact\":\"LOW\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"LOW\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":1.4,\"impactScore\":3.7}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-191\"}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://github.com/GCatt-AS/CVE-2025-47256\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\"},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/libxmp/libxmp/blob/ec22d1c7b93c8f681f8504a6c61c6f8a52458a10/src/loaders/prowizard/pha.c#L35\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\"},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/libxmp/libxmp/issues/847\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\"}]}}" } }
Loading...
Loading...
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.