cve-2025-41091
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2025-09-30 11:10
Modified
2025-09-30 19:18
Severity ?
EPSS score ?
Summary
Insecure Direct Object Reference in GPS BOLD Workplanner
References
Impacted products
▼ | Vendor | Product |
---|---|---|
GLOBAL PLANNING SOLUTIONS S.L (GPS) | BOLD Workplanner |
{ "containers": { "adp": [ { "metrics": [ { "other": { "content": { "id": "CVE-2025-41091", "options": [ { "Exploitation": "none" }, { "Automatable": "no" }, { "Technical Impact": "partial" } ], "role": "CISA Coordinator", "timestamp": "2025-09-30T19:18:08.337566Z", "version": "2.0.3" }, "type": "ssvc" } } ], "providerMetadata": { "dateUpdated": "2025-09-30T19:18:22.090Z", "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0", "shortName": "CISA-ADP" }, "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment" } ], "cna": { "affected": [ { "defaultStatus": "unaffected", "product": "BOLD Workplanner", "vendor": "GLOBAL PLANNING SOLUTIONS S.L (GPS)", "versions": [ { "status": "affected", "version": "2.5.24" } ] } ], "credits": [ { "lang": "en", "type": "finder", "value": "\u00c1ngel Gonz\u00e1lez" } ], "descriptions": [ { "lang": "en", "supportingMedia": [ { "base64": false, "type": "text/html", "value": "Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) vulnerability in BOLD Workplanner in versions prior to 2.5.25 (\u003ci\u003e4935b438f9b\u003c/i\u003e), consisting of a lack of adequate validation of user input, allowing an authenticated user to\u0026nbsp;access to calendar details using unauthorised internal identifiers.\u003cbr\u003e" } ], "value": "Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) vulnerability in BOLD Workplanner in versions prior to 2.5.25 (4935b438f9b), consisting of a lack of adequate validation of user input, allowing an authenticated user to\u00a0access to calendar details using unauthorised internal identifiers." } ], "metrics": [ { "cvssV4_0": { "Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED", "Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED", "Safety": "NOT_DEFINED", "attackComplexity": "LOW", "attackRequirements": "NONE", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "baseScore": 7.1, "baseSeverity": "HIGH", "privilegesRequired": "LOW", "providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED", "subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE", "subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE", "subIntegrityImpact": "NONE", "userInteraction": "NONE", "valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED", "vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N", "version": "4.0", "vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE", "vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE", "vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED" }, "format": "CVSS", "scenarios": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "GENERAL" } ] } ], "problemTypes": [ { "descriptions": [ { "cweId": "CWE-639", "description": "CWE-639 Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key", "lang": "en", "type": "CWE" } ] } ], "providerMetadata": { "dateUpdated": "2025-09-30T11:10:49.088Z", "orgId": "0cbda920-cd7f-484a-8e76-bf7f4b7f4516", "shortName": "INCIBE" }, "references": [ { "url": "https://www.incibe.es/en/incibe-cert/notices/aviso/insecure-direct-object-reference-gps-bold-workplanner" } ], "source": { "discovery": "UNKNOWN" }, "title": "Insecure Direct Object Reference in GPS BOLD Workplanner", "x_generator": { "engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0" } } }, "cveMetadata": { "assignerOrgId": "0cbda920-cd7f-484a-8e76-bf7f4b7f4516", "assignerShortName": "INCIBE", "cveId": "CVE-2025-41091", "datePublished": "2025-09-30T11:10:49.088Z", "dateReserved": "2025-04-16T09:09:36.724Z", "dateUpdated": "2025-09-30T19:18:22.090Z", "state": "PUBLISHED" }, "dataType": "CVE_RECORD", "dataVersion": "5.1", "meta": { "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2025-41091\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"cve-coordination@incibe.es\",\"published\":\"2025-09-30T11:37:39.580\",\"lastModified\":\"2025-09-30T11:37:39.580\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Received\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) vulnerability in BOLD Workplanner in versions prior to 2.5.25 (4935b438f9b), consisting of a lack of adequate validation of user input, allowing an authenticated user to\u00a0access to calendar details using unauthorised internal identifiers.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV40\":[{\"source\":\"cve-coordination@incibe.es\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"4.0\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X\",\"baseScore\":7.1,\"baseSeverity\":\"HIGH\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"attackRequirements\":\"NONE\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"LOW\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"vulnConfidentialityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"vulnIntegrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"vulnAvailabilityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"subConfidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"subIntegrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"subAvailabilityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"exploitMaturity\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"confidentialityRequirement\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"integrityRequirement\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"availabilityRequirement\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedAttackVector\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedAttackComplexity\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedAttackRequirements\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedPrivilegesRequired\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedUserInteraction\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedVulnConfidentialityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedVulnIntegrityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedVulnAvailabilityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedSubConfidentialityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedSubIntegrityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedSubAvailabilityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"Safety\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"Automatable\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"Recovery\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"valueDensity\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"vulnerabilityResponseEffort\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"providerUrgency\":\"NOT_DEFINED\"}}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"cve-coordination@incibe.es\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-639\"}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://www.incibe.es/en/incibe-cert/notices/aviso/insecure-direct-object-reference-gps-bold-workplanner\",\"source\":\"cve-coordination@incibe.es\"}]}}" } }
Loading...
Loading...
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.