cve-2025-32395
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2025-04-10 13:25
Modified
2025-04-10 14:14
Severity ?
EPSS score ?
Summary
Vite has an `server.fs.deny` bypass with an invalid `request-target`
References
{ "containers": { "adp": [ { "metrics": [ { "other": { "content": { "id": "CVE-2025-32395", "options": [ { "Exploitation": "poc" }, { "Automatable": "no" }, { "Technical Impact": "partial" } ], "role": "CISA Coordinator", "timestamp": "2025-04-10T14:14:30.473382Z", "version": "2.0.3" }, "type": "ssvc" } } ], "providerMetadata": { "dateUpdated": "2025-04-10T14:14:40.591Z", "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0", "shortName": "CISA-ADP" }, "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment" } ], "cna": { "affected": [ { "product": "vite", "vendor": "vitejs", "versions": [ { "status": "affected", "version": "\u003e= 6.2.0, \u003c 6.2.6" }, { "status": "affected", "version": "\u003e= 6.1.0, \u003c 6.1.5" }, { "status": "affected", "version": "\u003e= 6.0.0, \u003c 6.0.15" }, { "status": "affected", "version": "\u003e= 5.0.0, \u003c 5.4.18" }, { "status": "affected", "version": "\u003c 4.5.13" } ] } ], "descriptions": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "Vite is a frontend tooling framework for javascript. Prior to 6.2.6, 6.1.5, 6.0.15, 5.4.18, and 4.5.13, the contents of arbitrary files can be returned to the browser if the dev server is running on Node or Bun. HTTP 1.1 spec (RFC 9112) does not allow # in request-target. Although an attacker can send such a request. For those requests with an invalid request-line (it includes request-target), the spec recommends to reject them with 400 or 301. The same can be said for HTTP 2. On Node and Bun, those requests are not rejected internally and is passed to the user land. For those requests, the value of http.IncomingMessage.url contains #. Vite assumed req.url won\u0027t contain # when checking server.fs.deny, allowing those kinds of requests to bypass the check. Only apps explicitly exposing the Vite dev server to the network (using --host or server.host config option) and running the Vite dev server on runtimes that are not Deno (e.g. Node, Bun) are affected. This vulnerability is fixed in 6.2.6, 6.1.5, 6.0.15, 5.4.18, and 4.5.13." } ], "metrics": [ { "cvssV4_0": { "attackComplexity": "LOW", "attackRequirements": "PRESENT", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "baseScore": 6, "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM", "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE", "subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE", "subIntegrityImpact": "NONE", "userInteraction": "PASSIVE", "vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N", "version": "4.0", "vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE", "vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE" } } ], "problemTypes": [ { "descriptions": [ { "cweId": "CWE-200", "description": "CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor", "lang": "en", "type": "CWE" } ] } ], "providerMetadata": { "dateUpdated": "2025-04-10T13:25:19.177Z", "orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa", "shortName": "GitHub_M" }, "references": [ { "name": "https://github.com/vitejs/vite/security/advisories/GHSA-356w-63v5-8wf4", "tags": [ "x_refsource_CONFIRM" ], "url": "https://github.com/vitejs/vite/security/advisories/GHSA-356w-63v5-8wf4" }, { "name": "https://github.com/vitejs/vite/commit/175a83909f02d3b554452a7bd02b9f340cdfef70", "tags": [ "x_refsource_MISC" ], "url": "https://github.com/vitejs/vite/commit/175a83909f02d3b554452a7bd02b9f340cdfef70" } ], "source": { "advisory": "GHSA-356w-63v5-8wf4", "discovery": "UNKNOWN" }, "title": "Vite has an `server.fs.deny` bypass with an invalid `request-target`" } }, "cveMetadata": { "assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa", "assignerShortName": "GitHub_M", "cveId": "CVE-2025-32395", "datePublished": "2025-04-10T13:25:19.177Z", "dateReserved": "2025-04-06T19:46:02.464Z", "dateUpdated": "2025-04-10T14:14:40.591Z", "state": "PUBLISHED" }, "dataType": "CVE_RECORD", "dataVersion": "5.1", "meta": { "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2025-32395\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"published\":\"2025-04-10T14:15:29.463\",\"lastModified\":\"2025-04-11T15:39:52.920\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Awaiting Analysis\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"Vite is a frontend tooling framework for javascript. Prior to 6.2.6, 6.1.5, 6.0.15, 5.4.18, and 4.5.13, the contents of arbitrary files can be returned to the browser if the dev server is running on Node or Bun. HTTP 1.1 spec (RFC 9112) does not allow # in request-target. Although an attacker can send such a request. For those requests with an invalid request-line (it includes request-target), the spec recommends to reject them with 400 or 301. The same can be said for HTTP 2. On Node and Bun, those requests are not rejected internally and is passed to the user land. For those requests, the value of http.IncomingMessage.url contains #. Vite assumed req.url won\u0027t contain # when checking server.fs.deny, allowing those kinds of requests to bypass the check. Only apps explicitly exposing the Vite dev server to the network (using --host or server.host config option) and running the Vite dev server on runtimes that are not Deno (e.g. Node, Bun) are affected. This vulnerability is fixed in 6.2.6, 6.1.5, 6.0.15, 5.4.18, and 4.5.13.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"Vite es un framework frontend para javascript. Antes de 6.2.6, 6.1.5, 6.0.15, 5.4.18 y 4.5.13, el contenido de archivos arbitrarios se puede devolver al navegador si el servidor de desarrollo se ejecuta en Node o Bun. La especificaci\u00f3n HTTP 1.1 (RFC 9112) no permite # en el destino de la solicitud. Aunque un atacante puede enviar dicha solicitud. Para aquellas solicitudes con una l\u00ednea de solicitud no v\u00e1lida (incluye el objetivo de la solicitud), la especificaci\u00f3n recomienda rechazarlas con 400 o 301. Lo mismo puede decirse de HTTP 2. En Node y Bun, esas solicitudes no se rechazan internamente y se pasan al \u00e1rea del usuario. Para esas solicitudes, el valor de http.IncomingMessage.url contiene #. Vite asumi\u00f3 que req.url no contendr\u00e1 # al verificar server.fs.deny, permitiendo que ese tipo de solicitudes eviten la verificaci\u00f3n. Solo se ven afectadas las aplicaciones que exponen expl\u00edcitamente el servidor de desarrollo de Vite a la red (utilizando la opci\u00f3n de configuraci\u00f3n --host o server.host) y que ejecutan el servidor de desarrollo de Vite en entornos de ejecuci\u00f3n que no son Deno (por ejemplo, Node, Bun). Esta vulnerabilidad se corrigi\u00f3 en 6.2.6, 6.1.5, 6.0.15, 5.4.18 y 4.5.13.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV40\":[{\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"4.0\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X\",\"baseScore\":6.0,\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"attackRequirements\":\"PRESENT\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"PASSIVE\",\"vulnConfidentialityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"vulnIntegrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"vulnAvailabilityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"subConfidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"subIntegrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"subAvailabilityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"exploitMaturity\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"confidentialityRequirement\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"integrityRequirement\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"availabilityRequirement\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedAttackVector\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedAttackComplexity\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedAttackRequirements\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedPrivilegesRequired\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedUserInteraction\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedVulnConfidentialityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedVulnIntegrityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedVulnAvailabilityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedSubConfidentialityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedSubIntegrityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedSubAvailabilityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"Safety\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"Automatable\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"Recovery\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"valueDensity\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"vulnerabilityResponseEffort\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"providerUrgency\":\"NOT_DEFINED\"}}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-200\"}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://github.com/vitejs/vite/commit/175a83909f02d3b554452a7bd02b9f340cdfef70\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\"},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/vitejs/vite/security/advisories/GHSA-356w-63v5-8wf4\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\"}]}}" } }
Loading...
Loading...
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.