cve-2025-29911
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2025-03-17 22:20
Modified
2025-03-18 13:17
Summary
CryptoLib Has Heap Buffer Overflow in Crypto_AOS_ProcessSecurity Function
Impacted products
nasaCryptoLib
Show details on NVD website


{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2025-29911",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "poc"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "yes"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "total"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2025-03-18T13:17:41.018900Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2025-03-18T13:17:45.829Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "references": [
          {
            "tags": [
              "exploit"
            ],
            "url": "https://github.com/nasa/CryptoLib/security/advisories/GHSA-7g6g-9gj4-8c68"
          }
        ],
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "CryptoLib",
          "vendor": "nasa",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "\u003c= 1.3.3"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CryptoLib provides a software-only solution using the CCSDS Space Data Link Security Protocol - Extended Procedures (SDLS-EP) to secure communications between a spacecraft running the core Flight System (cFS) and a ground station. A critical heap buffer overflow vulnerability was identified in the `Crypto_AOS_ProcessSecurity` function of CryptoLib versions 1.3.3 and prior. This vulnerability allows an attacker to trigger a Denial of Service (DoS) or potentially execute arbitrary code (RCE) by providing a maliciously crafted AOS frame with an insufficient length. The vulnerability lies in the function `Crypto_AOS_ProcessSecurity`, specifically during the processing of the Frame Error Control Field (FECF). The affected code attempts to read from the `p_ingest` buffer at indices `current_managed_parameters_struct.max_frame_size - 2` and `current_managed_parameters_struct.max_frame_size - 1` without verifying if `len_ingest` is sufficiently large. This leads to a heap buffer overflow when `len_ingest` is smaller than `max_frame_size`. As of time of publication, no known patched versions exist."
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV4_0": {
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackRequirements": "NONE",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "baseScore": 8.9,
            "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
            "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
            "subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P",
            "version": "4.0",
            "vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
            "vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
            "vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH"
          }
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-122",
              "description": "CWE-122: Heap-based Buffer Overflow",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2025-03-17T22:20:15.289Z",
        "orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
        "shortName": "GitHub_M"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/nasa/CryptoLib/security/advisories/GHSA-7g6g-9gj4-8c68",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_CONFIRM"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/nasa/CryptoLib/security/advisories/GHSA-7g6g-9gj4-8c68"
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "advisory": "GHSA-7g6g-9gj4-8c68",
        "discovery": "UNKNOWN"
      },
      "title": "CryptoLib Has Heap Buffer Overflow in Crypto_AOS_ProcessSecurity Function"
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
    "assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
    "cveId": "CVE-2025-29911",
    "datePublished": "2025-03-17T22:20:15.289Z",
    "dateReserved": "2025-03-12T13:42:22.134Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2025-03-18T13:17:45.829Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1",
  "meta": {
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2025-29911\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"published\":\"2025-03-17T23:15:18.293\",\"lastModified\":\"2025-03-18T14:15:44.023\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Received\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CryptoLib provides a software-only solution using the CCSDS Space Data Link Security Protocol - Extended Procedures (SDLS-EP) to secure communications between a spacecraft running the core Flight System (cFS) and a ground station. A critical heap buffer overflow vulnerability was identified in the `Crypto_AOS_ProcessSecurity` function of CryptoLib versions 1.3.3 and prior. This vulnerability allows an attacker to trigger a Denial of Service (DoS) or potentially execute arbitrary code (RCE) by providing a maliciously crafted AOS frame with an insufficient length. The vulnerability lies in the function `Crypto_AOS_ProcessSecurity`, specifically during the processing of the Frame Error Control Field (FECF). The affected code attempts to read from the `p_ingest` buffer at indices `current_managed_parameters_struct.max_frame_size - 2` and `current_managed_parameters_struct.max_frame_size - 1` without verifying if `len_ingest` is sufficiently large. This leads to a heap buffer overflow when `len_ingest` is smaller than `max_frame_size`. As of time of publication, no known patched versions exist.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"CryptoLib ofrece una soluci\u00f3n exclusivamente de software que utiliza el Protocolo de Seguridad de Enlace de Datos Espaciales CCSDS - Procedimientos Extendidos (SDLS-EP) para proteger las comunicaciones entre una nave espacial que ejecuta el Sistema de Vuelo (cFS) y una estaci\u00f3n terrestre. Se identific\u00f3 una vulnerabilidad cr\u00edtica de desbordamiento del b\u00fafer de pila en la funci\u00f3n `Crypto_AOS_ProcessSecurity` de las versiones 1.3.3 y anteriores de CryptoLib. Esta vulnerabilidad permite a un atacante activar una denegaci\u00f3n de servicio (DoS) o, potencialmente, ejecutar c\u00f3digo arbitrario (RCE) al proporcionar una trama AOS maliciosa con una longitud insuficiente. La vulnerabilidad reside en la funci\u00f3n `Crypto_AOS_ProcessSecurity`, espec\u00edficamente durante el procesamiento del Campo de Control de Error de Trama (FECF). El c\u00f3digo afectado intenta leer del b\u00fafer `p_ingest` en los \u00edndices `current_managed_parameters_struct.max_frame_size - 2` y `current_managed_parameters_struct.max_frame_size - 1` sin verificar si `len_ingest` es lo suficientemente grande. Esto provoca un desbordamiento del b\u00fafer del mont\u00f3n cuando `len_ingest` es menor que `max_frame_size`. Al momento de la publicaci\u00f3n, no se conoc\u00edan versiones parcheadas.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV40\":[{\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"4.0\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X\",\"baseScore\":8.9,\"baseSeverity\":\"HIGH\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"attackRequirements\":\"NONE\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"vulnConfidentialityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"vulnIntegrityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"vulnAvailabilityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"subConfidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"subIntegrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"subAvailabilityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"exploitMaturity\":\"PROOF_OF_CONCEPT\",\"confidentialityRequirement\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"integrityRequirement\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"availabilityRequirement\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedAttackVector\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedAttackComplexity\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedAttackRequirements\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedPrivilegesRequired\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedUserInteraction\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedVulnConfidentialityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedVulnIntegrityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedVulnAvailabilityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedSubConfidentialityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedSubIntegrityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedSubAvailabilityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"Safety\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"Automatable\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"Recovery\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"valueDensity\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"vulnerabilityResponseEffort\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"providerUrgency\":\"NOT_DEFINED\"}}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-122\"}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://github.com/nasa/CryptoLib/security/advisories/GHSA-7g6g-9gj4-8c68\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\"},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/nasa/CryptoLib/security/advisories/GHSA-7g6g-9gj4-8c68\",\"source\":\"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\"}]}}"
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading...

Loading...

Loading...
  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.