cve-2024-9000
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2025-03-20 10:09
Modified
2025-03-20 18:55
Summary
Improper Authorization and Duplicate Slug Vulnerability in lunary-ai/lunary
Impacted products
lunary-ailunary-ai/lunary
Show details on NVD website


{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2024-9000",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "poc"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "no"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2025-03-20T17:50:58.511191Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2025-03-20T18:55:03.954Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "lunary-ai/lunary",
          "vendor": "lunary-ai",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "1.4.26",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "unspecified",
              "versionType": "custom"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "In lunary-ai/lunary before version 1.4.26, the checklists.post() endpoint allows users to create or modify checklists without validating whether the user has proper permissions. This missing access control permits unauthorized users to create checklists, bypassing intended permission checks. Additionally, the endpoint does not validate the uniqueness of the slug field when creating a new checklist, allowing an attacker to spoof existing checklists by reusing the slug of an already-existing checklist. This can lead to significant data integrity issues, as legitimate checklists can be replaced with malicious or altered data."
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV3_0": {
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "baseScore": 7.1,
            "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
            "confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
            "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
            "privilegesRequired": "LOW",
            "scope": "UNCHANGED",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N",
            "version": "3.0"
          }
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-285",
              "description": "CWE-285 Improper Authorization",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2025-03-20T10:09:25.798Z",
        "orgId": "c09c270a-b464-47c1-9133-acb35b22c19a",
        "shortName": "@huntr_ai"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "url": "https://huntr.com/bounties/f5fca549-0a4a-4f64-8ccf-d4e108856da4"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://github.com/lunary-ai/lunary/commit/a02861ef9bb6ce860a35f7b8f178d58859cd85f0"
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "advisory": "f5fca549-0a4a-4f64-8ccf-d4e108856da4",
        "discovery": "EXTERNAL"
      },
      "title": "Improper Authorization and Duplicate Slug Vulnerability in lunary-ai/lunary"
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "c09c270a-b464-47c1-9133-acb35b22c19a",
    "assignerShortName": "@huntr_ai",
    "cveId": "CVE-2024-9000",
    "datePublished": "2025-03-20T10:09:25.798Z",
    "dateReserved": "2024-09-19T14:18:52.464Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2025-03-20T18:55:03.954Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1",
  "meta": {
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2024-9000\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"security@huntr.dev\",\"published\":\"2025-03-20T10:15:45.957\",\"lastModified\":\"2025-04-10T18:46:42.957\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Analyzed\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"In lunary-ai/lunary before version 1.4.26, the checklists.post() endpoint allows users to create or modify checklists without validating whether the user has proper permissions. This missing access control permits unauthorized users to create checklists, bypassing intended permission checks. Additionally, the endpoint does not validate the uniqueness of the slug field when creating a new checklist, allowing an attacker to spoof existing checklists by reusing the slug of an already-existing checklist. This can lead to significant data integrity issues, as legitimate checklists can be replaced with malicious or altered data.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"En lunary-ai/lunary anteriores a la versi\u00f3n 1.4.26, el endpoint checklists.post() permit\u00eda a los usuarios crear o modificar listas de verificaci\u00f3n sin verificar si ten\u00edan los permisos adecuados. Esta falta de control de acceso permit\u00eda a usuarios no autorizados crear listas de verificaci\u00f3n, omitiendo las comprobaciones de permisos. Adem\u00e1s, el endpoint no validaba la unicidad del campo slug al crear una nueva lista de verificaci\u00f3n, lo que permit\u00eda a un atacante falsificar listas de verificaci\u00f3n existentes reutilizando el slug de una ya existente. Esto puede generar importantes problemas de integridad de los datos, ya que las listas de verificaci\u00f3n leg\u00edtimas pueden ser reemplazadas con datos maliciosos o alterados.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N\",\"baseScore\":6.5,\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"LOW\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"integrityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":2.8,\"impactScore\":3.6}],\"cvssMetricV30\":[{\"source\":\"security@huntr.dev\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.0\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N\",\"baseScore\":7.1,\"baseSeverity\":\"HIGH\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"LOW\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"LOW\",\"integrityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":2.8,\"impactScore\":4.2}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"security@huntr.dev\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-285\"}]},{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"NVD-CWE-noinfo\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:lunary:lunary:1.4.26:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"9A5D8DFF-66B1-413D-A8D9-1188C5DA9EF6\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://github.com/lunary-ai/lunary/commit/a02861ef9bb6ce860a35f7b8f178d58859cd85f0\",\"source\":\"security@huntr.dev\",\"tags\":[\"Patch\"]},{\"url\":\"https://huntr.com/bounties/f5fca549-0a4a-4f64-8ccf-d4e108856da4\",\"source\":\"security@huntr.dev\",\"tags\":[\"Exploit\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]}]}}"
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading...

Loading...

Loading...
  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.