cve-2024-6827
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2025-03-20 10:09
Modified
2025-03-20 18:32
Summary
HTTP Request Smuggling in benoitc/gunicorn
Impacted products
benoitcbenoitc/gunicorn
Show details on NVD website


{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2024-6827",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "poc"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "yes"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2025-03-20T17:52:37.458445Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2025-03-20T18:32:51.799Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "benoitc/gunicorn",
          "vendor": "benoitc",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThanOrEqual": "latest",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "unspecified",
              "versionType": "custom"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "Gunicorn version 21.2.0 does not properly validate the value of the \u0027Transfer-Encoding\u0027 header as specified in the RFC standards, which leads to the default fallback method of \u0027Content-Length,\u0027 making it vulnerable to TE.CL request smuggling. This vulnerability can lead to cache poisoning, data exposure, session manipulation, SSRF, XSS, DoS, data integrity compromise, security bypass, information leakage, and business logic abuse."
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV3_0": {
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "baseScore": 7.5,
            "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
            "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
            "integrityImpact": "NONE",
            "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
            "scope": "UNCHANGED",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
            "version": "3.0"
          }
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-444",
              "description": "CWE-444 Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2025-03-20T10:09:55.725Z",
        "orgId": "c09c270a-b464-47c1-9133-acb35b22c19a",
        "shortName": "@huntr_ai"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "url": "https://huntr.com/bounties/1b4f8f38-39da-44b6-9f98-f618639d0dd7"
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "advisory": "1b4f8f38-39da-44b6-9f98-f618639d0dd7",
        "discovery": "EXTERNAL"
      },
      "title": "HTTP Request Smuggling in benoitc/gunicorn"
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "c09c270a-b464-47c1-9133-acb35b22c19a",
    "assignerShortName": "@huntr_ai",
    "cveId": "CVE-2024-6827",
    "datePublished": "2025-03-20T10:09:55.725Z",
    "dateReserved": "2024-07-16T23:32:47.872Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2025-03-20T18:32:51.799Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1",
  "meta": {
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2024-6827\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"security@huntr.dev\",\"published\":\"2025-03-20T10:15:33.357\",\"lastModified\":\"2025-03-20T10:15:33.357\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Awaiting Analysis\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"Gunicorn version 21.2.0 does not properly validate the value of the \u0027Transfer-Encoding\u0027 header as specified in the RFC standards, which leads to the default fallback method of \u0027Content-Length,\u0027 making it vulnerable to TE.CL request smuggling. This vulnerability can lead to cache poisoning, data exposure, session manipulation, SSRF, XSS, DoS, data integrity compromise, security bypass, information leakage, and business logic abuse.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"La versi\u00f3n 21.2.0 de Gunicorn no valida correctamente el valor del encabezado \\\"Transfer-Encoding\\\" seg\u00fan lo especificado en los est\u00e1ndares RFC, lo que lleva al m\u00e9todo de respaldo predeterminado \\\"Content-Length\\\", lo que la hace vulnerable al contrabando de solicitudes TE.CL. Esta vulnerabilidad puede provocar envenenamiento de cach\u00e9, exposici\u00f3n de datos, manipulaci\u00f3n de sesiones, SSRF, XSS, denegaci\u00f3n de servicio (DoS), vulneraci\u00f3n de la integridad de los datos, elusi\u00f3n de seguridad, fuga de informaci\u00f3n y abuso de la l\u00f3gica de negocio.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV30\":[{\"source\":\"security@huntr.dev\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.0\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N\",\"baseScore\":7.5,\"baseSeverity\":\"HIGH\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"integrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":3.9,\"impactScore\":3.6}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"security@huntr.dev\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-444\"}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://huntr.com/bounties/1b4f8f38-39da-44b6-9f98-f618639d0dd7\",\"source\":\"security@huntr.dev\"}]}}"
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading...

Loading...

Loading...
  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.